Solr strives to keep backwards-compatible 1 major revision, so 4.x
should be able to work with 3.x indexes. One caution though, well
actually two.
1> If you have a master/slave setup, upgrade the _slaves_ first. If
you upgrade a master fist and it merges segments, then the slaves
won't be able to
Thank you Shawn. This was detailed and very helpful.
Skand.
On May 7, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/7/2013 3:11 PM, Skand Gupta wrote:
>> We have a fairly large (in the order of 10s of TB) indices built using Solr
>> 3.5. We are considering migrating to Solr 4.3 and was wonderin
On 5/7/2013 3:11 PM, Skand Gupta wrote:
We have a fairly large (in the order of 10s of TB) indices built using Solr
3.5. We are considering migrating to Solr 4.3 and was wondering what the
policy is on maintaining backward compatibility of the indices? Will 4.3
work with my 3.5 indexes? Because o
We have a fairly large (in the order of 10s of TB) indices built using Solr
3.5. We are considering migrating to Solr 4.3 and was wondering what the
policy is on maintaining backward compatibility of the indices? Will 4.3
work with my 3.5 indexes? Because of the large data size, I would ideally
lik
We have a fairly large (in the order of 10s of TB) indices built using Solr
3.5. We are considering migrating to Solr 4.3 and was wondering what the
policy is on maintaining backward compatibility of the indices? Will 4.3
work with my 3.5 indexes? Because of the large data size, I would ideally
lik
