ely see HTML in queries, but we never know when
> someone will get clever with the source text, sigh.
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>
> > On Sep 10, 2020, at 9:48 AM, Erick Erickson
> wrote:
> >
son wrote:
>
> When you want to do something different and index and query time. There, an
> answer that’s almost, but not quite, completely useless while being accurate
> ;)
>
> A concrete example is synonyms as have been mentioned. Say you have an
> index-time synon
When you want to do something different and index and query time. There, an
answer that’s almost, but not quite, completely useless while being accurate ;)
A concrete example is synonyms as have been mentioned. Say you have an
index-time synonym definition of
A,B,C
These three tokens will be
gt;
>
>
> Why would one want to not use the same logic for both and simply use:
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
>
>
> What are real word use cases to use a different analyzer for index and
> query?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
; Why would one want to not use the same logic for both and simply use:
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
>
>
> What are real word use cases to use a different analyzer for index and
> query?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
> Why would one want to not use the same logic for both and simply use:
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
>
>
> What are real word use cases to use a different analyzer for index and
> query?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
. Google "solr synonyms index vs
query"
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Steven White
Sent: September 10, 2020 8:19 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Why use a different analyzer for "index" and "query"?
[EXTERNAL] This email came from an external sou
logic for both and simply use:
What are real word use cases to use a different analyzer for index and
query?
Thanks,
Steve
Thomas:
If you go to the admin UI, pick a collection (or core) and go to the
"analysis" page. Put different values in the "index" and "query" entry
boxes. Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words ;).
And, indeed, synonyms are one of the prime filters that a
tags.
Best,
Andrea
On 15/08/18 20:43, Zimmermann, Thomas wrote:
Hi,
We have the text field below configured on fields that are both stored
and indexed. It seems to me that applying the same filters on both index
and query would be redundant, and perhaps a waste of processing on the
retrieval
ime
>I can't imagine a scenario where the user inputs queries containing HTML
>tags.
>
>Best,
>Andrea
>
>On 15/08/18 20:43, Zimmermann, Thomas wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have the text field below configured on fields that are both stored
>>and indexed. It see
query time
I can't imagine a scenario where the user inputs queries containing HTML
tags.
Best,
Andrea
On 15/08/18 20:43, Zimmermann, Thomas wrote:
Hi,
We have the text field below configured on fields that are both stored and
indexed. It seems to me that applying the same filter
Hi,
We have the text field below configured on fields that are both stored and
indexed. It seems to me that applying the same filters on both index and query
would be redundant, and perhaps a waste of processing on the retrieval side if
the filter work was already done on the index side. Is
I also opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10532 to fix
this annoying and confusing behavior of SuggestComponent.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
> Ah great, many thanks again!
>
>
>
> On 20/04/17 17:09, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>> Lo
Ah great, many thanks again!
On 20/04/17 17:09, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
Hi Andrea,
Looks like I have you some bad information. I looked at the code and
ran a test locally. The suggest.build and suggest.reload params are in
fact distributed across to all shards but only to one replica of e
Hi Andrea,
Looks like I have you some bad information. I looked at the code and
ran a test locally. The suggest.build and suggest.reload params are in
fact distributed across to all shards but only to one replica of each
shard. This is still bad enough and you should use buildOnOptimize as
suggest
Perfect, I don't need NRT at this moment so that fits perfectly
Thanks,
Andrea
On 20/04/17 14:37, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
Yeah, if it is just once a day then you can afford to do an optimize.
For a more NRT indexing approach, I wouldn't recommend optimize at
all.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5
Yeah, if it is just once a day then you can afford to do an optimize.
For a more NRT indexing approach, I wouldn't recommend optimize at
all.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
> Ok, many thanks
>
> I see / read that it should be better to rely on the background merging
> in
Ok, many thanks
I see / read that it should be better to rely on the background merging
instead of issuing explicit optimizes, but I think in this case one
optimize in a day it shouldn't be a problem.
Did I get you correctly?
Thanks again,
Andrea
On 20/04/17 13:17, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wro
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
> Hi Shalin,
> many thanks for your response. This is my scenario:
>
> * I build my index once in a day, it could be a delta or a full
>re-index.In any case, that takes some time;
> * I have an auto-commit (hard, no soft-commits) set t
Hi Shalin,
many thanks for your response. This is my scenario:
* I build my index once in a day, it could be a delta or a full
re-index.In any case, that takes some time;
* I have an auto-commit (hard, no soft-commits) set to a given period
and during the indexing cycle, several hard comm
Comments inline:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
> Hi,
> any help out there?
>
> BTW I forgot the Solr version: 6.5.0
>
> Thanks,
> Andrea
>
>
> On 18/04/17 11:45, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I have a project, with SolrCloud, where I'm going to use the Suggester
Hi,
any help out there?
BTW I forgot the Solr version: 6.5.0
Thanks,
Andrea
On 18/04/17 11:45, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
Hi,
I have a project, with SolrCloud, where I'm going to use the Suggester
component (BlendedInfixLookupFactory with DocumentDictionaryFactory).
Some info:
* I will have
Hi,
I have a project, with SolrCloud, where I'm going to use the Suggester
component (BlendedInfixLookupFactory with DocumentDictionaryFactory).
Some info:
* I will have a suggest-only collection, with no NRT requirements
(indexes will be updated with a daily frequency)
* I'm not yet sure
Thank you. I like both option XSLT and mapping rules. Would you please
provide some pointers to it? so that I can use it.
Thanks again.
Regards,
rn
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> Additionally,
>
> Solr can index arbitrary XML by applying an XSLT transform to it
Would you please elaborate the 1>
I guess you are saying add an attribute in managed-schema that is stored
only. i.e
While posting the doc provide the location of file with loc attribute?
Thanks again.
Regards,
rn
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> bq: How original docu
Additionally,
Solr can index arbitrary XML by applying an XSLT transform to it
before indexing. But you still need to write the XSLT transform.
Solr can also index arbitrary XML with DataImportHandler by pulling
out specific fields. But you need to write mapping rules.
I am not sure what exactly
bq: How original document X will be returned? Should I store location
of X in Tx? I s there a generic way of doing it?
A couple of choices here:
1> create a stored-only field (i.e. stored="true" indexed="false"
docValues="false") and stuff the original in that. It'll chew up some
disk space, but
Solr does not index XML. Period.
Solr uses an XML protocol for indexing. It can also use JSON or binary
protocols for indexing.
You need to convert your XML document into fields, then send those fields to
Solr using one of the indexing protocols.
If you need an XML database and search engine,
Thank you Erick for such a prompt reply. I am bit confused.
Suppose I have a document X, I transformed it document Tx. Tx matches the
format that you have described. I post Tx and I asume it get indexed.
Now I query. How original document X will be returned? Should I store
location of X in Tx?
Solr does _not_ index arbitrary XML, it will index XML in a very
specific format, i.e.
value
.
.
So if you're sending arbitrary XML to Solr I'm actually surprised it's indexing.
You might be able to do something with sending docs through Tika
(ExtractingRequestHandler).
Good Afternoon,
I am trying to index xml documents and query them. Once query successfully
matches, I am hoping to download the uploaded and indexed xml document.
Initially I thought solr supports xml. Thus I did not make any change to my
default installation. However I was not able to query wi
_name}[ DATA ]
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers
>
>
> : Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:45:57 +0530
> : From: Anil
> : Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> : To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> : Subject: Re: Index and query brackets
: Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:45:57 +0530
: From: Anil
: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: Re: Index and query brackets
:
: NO Ediwin. Thanks for your response.
:
: i was checking how to check [1 TO 5] as a content not as a range query.
:
: i tried by
; Are you referring to something like q=level:[1 TO 5] ? This will search for
> level that ranges from 1 to 5.
> You may refer to the documentation here:
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
>
> On 4 July 2016 at 15:05, Anil wrote:
>
Hi Anil,
Are you referring to something like q=level:[1 TO 5] ? This will search for
level that ranges from 1 to 5.
You may refer to the documentation here:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax
Regards,
Edwin
On 4 July 2016 at 15:05, Anil wrote:
> HI,
>
> how can index
HI,
how can index and query content with brackets as bracket is used for range
query
Ex : [DATA]
-
Anil
added one new field 'startPrice'. i am
> selecting that filed but it is not coming in response. what would be the
> probme,
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-index-and-query-newly-added-filed-tp4205595.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
66.n3.nabble.com/how-to-index-and-query-newly-added-filed-tp4205595.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
;hello", "world"} instead of
index {"hello_world"}.
I search on internet and I see types="wdfftypes.txt", but I don't know how
to define delimiter in types="wdfftypes.txt".
Help me solve this problem!
-
Phat T. Dong
--
View this message in
Thanks for the insight Shawn, extremely helpful.
Appreciate it.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Best-practice-to-index-and-query-SolrCloud-tp4091823p4091836.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
nclude all four server information. But then any change in the server
configuration will have an impact.Any help will be
appreciated.Regards,Shamik
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Best-practice-to-index-and-query-SolrCloud-tp4091817.html
Sent from the Solr - Us
On 9/24/2013 2:46 PM, Shamik Bandopadhyay wrote:
Now, I'm using SolrJ client (CloudSolrServer) to send documents for
indexing. Based on SolrCloud fundamentals, I can send the document to any
of the four servers or to a specific shard id. Is it advisable to use the
server information directly into
Hi,
I'm new to SolrCloud , trying to set up a test environment based on
the wiki documentation. Based on the example, the setup and sample indexing
/ query works fine. But I need some pointers on the best practices of
indexing / querying in SolrCloud. For e.g. I've 2 shards, with 1 leader an
e.org
Subject: Re: How to index and query "C#" as whole term?
The other advantage to the synonyms approach is it will be much less
of a headache down the road.
For instance, imagine you've defined "whitespacetokenizer" and
"lowercasefilter".
That'll fix
us Jelsma [mailto:markus.jel...@openindex.io]
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:51 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to index and query "C#" as whole term?
>
> Before indexing so outside Solr? Using the SynonymFilter would be easier
> i
> guess.
>
, May 16, 2011 8:51 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to index and query "C#" as whole term?
Before indexing so outside Solr? Using the SynonymFilter would be easier
i
guess.
On Monday 16 May 2011 17:44:24 Robert Petersen wrote:
> I have always just converted terms
d similarly converted those terms if
> someone searched on them. That always has worked just fine for me...
>
> :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:28 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> S
nathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to index and query "C#" as whole term?
I don't think you'd want to use the string type here. String type is
almost never appropriate for a field you want t
the value is still split into different
tokens on word boundaries; you just don't want an analyzer set that
removes punctuation.
On 5/16/2011 10:46 AM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Gnanakumar wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Apache Solr v3.1.
How do I configure/allow So
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Gnanakumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Apache Solr v3.1.
>
> How do I configure/allow Solr to both index and query the term "c#" as a
> whole word/term? From "Analysis" page, I could see that the term "c
Hi,
I'm using Apache Solr v3.1.
How do I configure/allow Solr to both index and query the term "c#" as a
whole word/term? From "Analysis" page, I could see that the term "c#" is
being reduced/converted into just "c" by solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory.
Regards,
Gnanam
My mistake. The error turned out to be somewhere else and the described
approach seems to work.
Sorry for the wasted bandwidth.
On Mar 8, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Robert Krüger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've run into problems trying to achieve a seemingly simple thing. I'm
> indexing a bunch of files (loc
Hi,
I've run into problems trying to achieve a seemingly simple thing. I'm indexing
a bunch of files (local ones and potentially some accessible via other
protocols like http or ftp) and have an index field with the url to the file,
e.g. "file:/home/foo/bar.pdf". Now I want to perform two simpl
54 matches
Mail list logo
