: I have a problem with index time boosting. I created 4 new fields:
I think you are missunderstanding the meaning of index time boosting vs
query time boosting.
First of all, this is not meaninful syntax in your schema.xml...
:
...there is no "boost" property that can be set on a in
rote:
> Hi,
> this is my request handler from solrconfig.xml:
>
>
>
>
>
>explicit
>10
>text
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-time-field-boost
Hi,
this is my request handler from solrconfig.xml:
explicit
10
text
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-time-field-boosting-tp4016010p4016049.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ng mechaism does not work. Always
> scoring property equals to the same value.
>
> For example: search term = messi
> 1. title: messi, text: ronaldo
> 2. title ronaldo, text messi
> Expected result: the first entry should have higher scoring
> Current: Both have the same scoring.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-time-field-boosting-tp4016010.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
27;t understand why!
>
> May as well let this drop since we don't seem to be talking about the
> same thing . . . but thanks anyway,
>
> Ian.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
> Sent: 30 November 2009 23:05
> T
mber 2009 23:05
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: schema-based Index-time field boosting
: I am talking about field boosting rather than document boosting,
ie. I
: would like some fields (say eg. title) to be "louder" than others,
: across ALL documents. I believe you are a
l let this drop since we don't seem to be talking about the
same thing . . . but thanks anyway,
Ian.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: 30 November 2009 23:05
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: schema-based Index-time field boosti
: I am talking about field boosting rather than document boosting, ie. I
: would like some fields (say eg. title) to be "louder" than others,
: across ALL documents. I believe you are at least partially talking
: about document boosting, which clearly applies on a per-document basis.
index time
: Coming in a bit late but I would like a variant that is not a No-OP.
: Think of something like title:searchstring^10 OR catch_all:searchstring
: Of course I can always add the boosting at query time but it would make
: life easier if I could define a default boost in the schema so that my
: quer
a good idea BTW. Regards,
Ian.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: 23 November 2009 18:34
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: schema-based Index-time field boosting
: Yeah, like I said, I was mistaken about setting field boost in
: schem
On 23.11.2009 19:33 Chris Hostetter wrote:
> ...if there was a way to oost fields at index time that was configured in
> the schema.xml, then every doc would get that boost on it's instances of
> those fields but the only purpose of index time boosting is to indicate
> that one document is more
: Yeah, like I said, I was mistaken about setting field boost in
: schema.xml - doesn't mean it's a bad idea though. At any rate, from
: your penultimate sentence I reckon at least one of us is still confused
: about field boosting, feel free to reply if you think it's me ;)
Yeah ... i think it'
riginal Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: 21 November 2009 01:54
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: schema-based Index-time field boosting
: The field boost attribute was put there by me back in the 1.3 days,
when
: I somehow gained the mistaken
: The field boost attribute was put there by me back in the 1.3 days, when
: I somehow gained the mistaken impression that it was supposed to work!
: Of course, despite a lot of searching I haven't been able to find
: anything to back up my position ;)
solr has never supported anything like a "bo
this might not work in practice?
Regards,
Ian.
-Original Message-
From: Smiley, David W. [mailto:dsmi...@mitre.org]
Sent: 19 November 2009 19:29
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Index-time field boosting not working?
Hi Ian. Thanks for buying my book.
The "boost" at
Hi Ian. Thanks for buying my book.
The "boost" attribute goes on the field for the XML message you're sending to
Solr. In your example you mistakenly placed it in the schema.
FYI I use index time boosting as well as query time boosting. Although index
time boosting isn't something I can chan
butes_for_.2
2field.22 ?
Otis
--
Sematext is hiring -- http://sematext.com/about/jobs.html?mls
Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR
- Original Message
> From: Ian Smith
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, November 18, 2009 6:40:11 AM
> Subj
Otis
--
Sematext is hiring -- http://sematext.com/about/jobs.html?mls
Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR
- Original Message
> From: Ian Smith
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, November 18, 2009 6:40:11 AM
> Subject: Index-time field boost
I have the following field configured in schema.xml:
Where "text" is the type which came with the Solr distribution. I have
not been able to get this configuration to alter any document scores,
and if I look at the indexes in Luke there is no change in the norms
(compared to an un-boosted equiv
20 matches
Mail list logo
