On 8/8/06, bo_b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As mentioned in another post i am trying to index a vbulletin database
containing roughly 7 million posts. The very first query where I apply
sorting after a full indexing, seems to take roughly 264998
ms. Subsequent searches are fast.
I figure the reas
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 02:14 -0700, bo_b wrote:
> Is there any solution to this problem? I would like to be able to sort, but
> we cant live with 264 second downtime after every commit.
There has been many long threads in the Lucene-users forum on this
subject. Try searching for "sorting" in subjec
s(at least for sorting queries)..
Is there any solution to this problem? I would like to be able to sort, but
we cant live with 264 second downtime after every commit.
/Bo
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Incremental-updates-Sorting-problem-tf2071518.html#a5702953
Sent fro
