t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was wondering if the scripts provided in Solr do incremental replication.
Looking at the script for snapshooter, it seems like the whole index
directory is copied over. Is that correct ? If so, isn't performance a
problem over the long run ? Thanks for the
FYI, additional information on replication is available in the Solr TWiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CollectionDistribution
Bill
On 2/13/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/13/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Atleast from looking at the snapshooter script, i
On 2/13/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Atleast from looking at the snapshooter script, it doesn't
seem to be doing anything specific...
The snapshooter script only makes an "instant snapshot" of the index
directory using cp -lr. This does not involve any copying of index
data.
The
into temporary location
# then move it into place atomically
cp -lr ${data_dir}/index ${temp}
mv ${temp} ${name}
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Incremental-replication...-tf3222946.html#a8952716
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We have used replication for a few weeks now and it generally works well.
I believe you'll find that commit operations cause only new segments to be
transferred, whereas optimize operations cause the entire index to be
transferred. Therefore, the amount of data transferred really depends on how
fr
I was wondering if the scripts provided in Solr do incremental replication.
Looking at the script for snapshooter, it seems like the whole index
directory is copied over. Is that correct ? If so, isn't performance a
problem over the long run ? Thanks for the clarification in advance (I hope
