sey
> Sent: Thursday 13th June 2019 13:42
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Increased disk space usage 8.1.1 vs 7.7.1
>
> On 6/13/2019 4:19 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> > We are upgrading to Solr 8. One of our reindexed collections takes a GB
> > more than the pro
On 6/13/2019 4:19 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
We are upgrading to Solr 8. One of our reindexed collections takes a GB more
than the production uses which is on 7.7.1. Production also has deleted
documents. This means Solr 8 somehow uses more disk space. I have checked both
Solr and Lucene's CHANG
Hello,
For context it would probably be helpful to know some more info about the
collection. e.g. it's 1GB bigger, but what percentage increase does that
represent? Like is it 0.5% or 50%?
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 at 11:19, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are upgrading to Solr 8. One of our rei
If you look at the data files, is any extension suddenly taking way more
space? That may give a clue.
Also is schema the same? Like you did not enable docvalues on strings by
default or similar.
Regards,
Alex
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019, 6:19 AM Markus Jelsma,
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are upgrading
Hello,
We are upgrading to Solr 8. One of our reindexed collections takes a GB more
than the production uses which is on 7.7.1. Production also has deleted
documents. This means Solr 8 somehow uses more disk space. I have checked both
Solr and Lucene's CHANGES but no ticket was immediately obvi
