735009/result.xml result.xml
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Incorrect-sort-with-with-function-query-in-query-parameters-tp22735009p22735009.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
I have been intending to although I have been dragging my feet on it. I've
never opened a bug before so I'm not sure of the protocol. If you don't
mind, it would be great if you could send me a pm and point me in the right
direction.
Thanks,
Asif
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Ensdorf Ken
>
> A Unit test would be ideal, but even if you can just provide a list of
> steps (ie: using this solrconfig+schema, index these docs, then update
> this one doc, then execute this search) it can help people track things
> down.
>
> Please open a bug and attach as much detail as you can there.
>
>
: Any documents marked deleted in this index are just the result of updates to
: those documents. There are no purely deleted documents. Furthermore, the
: field that I am ordering by in my function query remains untouched over the
: updates.
it doesn't matter wether it was an update or a true
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Incorrect-sort-with-with-function-query-in-query-parameters-tp22735009p22741058.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Asif Rahman
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:24:19 PM
> Subject: Incorrect sort with with function query in query parameters
>
>
> Hi al
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Incorrect-sort-with-with-function-query-in-query-parameters-tp22735009p22735009.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
