day, January 22, 2012 6:42 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improving Solr Spell Checker Results
Hey James,
I have played around a bit more with the settings and tried setting
spellcheck.maxResultsForSuggest=100 and spellcheck.maxCollations=3. This
yields 'Sigourney Weaver
the Solr
source
code. So I am in the dark when you say it could be tailored for my
needs.
Also, how would it work? Query wise.. Would it be like..
spellcheck.series_name.q= and spellcheck.actor.q= and so on? If so that
sounds tempting to try and achieve. But if you could provide any
pointers in
what ex
tages, and thus far it is Trunk-only.
>>>>
>>>> I tried setting spellcheck.maxCollationTries to 5 to see if it would
>>>> help
>>>> with the above problem, but it did not.
>>>>
>>>> I have now tried using it in the context of question 2. I tried
>&
you say it could be tailored for my needs.
Also, how would it work? Query wise.. Would it be like..
spellcheck.series_name.q= and spellcheck.actor.q= and so on? If so that
sounds tempting to try and achieve. But if you could provide any pointers in
what exactly would be required that would really
>>> unrelated to your two questions, the patch on this issue introduces a new
>>> "ConjunctionSolrSpellChecker" which theoretically could be enhanced to do
>>> exactly what you want. That is, you could (theoretically) create separate
>>> dictionaries fo
lored for my needs. Also, how would it work? Query wise.. Would
it be like.. spellcheck.series_name.q= and spellcheck.actor.q= and
so on? If so that sounds tempting to try and achieve. But if you
could provide any pointers in what exactly would be required that
would really help.
Thanks agai
the Solr
source code. So I am in the dark when you say it could be tailored
for my needs. Also, how would it work? Query wise.. Would it be
like.. spellcheck.series_name.q= and spellcheck.actor.q= and so on?
If so that sounds tempting to try and achieve. But if you could
provide any pointers i
so, how would it work? Query wise.. Would it be like..
spellcheck.series_name.q= and spellcheck.actor.q= and so on? If so
that sounds tempting to try and achieve. But if you could provide any
pointers in what exactly would be required that would really help.
Thanks again for your time,
David
Jam
ty as the product database grows,
which isn't really what I wanted.
Thanks for your input though,
David
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Improving-Solr-Spell-Checker-Results-tp3658411p3669186.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
vide any
pointers in what exactly would be required that would really help.
Thanks again for your time,
David
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: David Radunz [mailto:da...@boxen.net]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 11:42 PM
To: so
ce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: David Radunz [mailto:da...@boxen.net]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 11:42 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Improving Solr Spell Checker Results
Hey,
Firstly I would like to thank you all for creating su
rtant difference between the two spellcheck
impls.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: O. Klein [mailto:kl...@octoweb.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 7:22 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Improving Solr Sp
ext:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Improving-Solr-Spell-Checker-Results-tp3658411p3669186.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
r each of the fields you're searching and let
the CSSC combine the results & generate collations, etc.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: David Radunz [mailto:da...@boxen.net]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 11:42 PM
To: solr-user@l
Hey,
Firstly I would like to thank you all for creating such a great
searching platform. What I was wondering is whether it is possible to:
1. Have the spell checker take into account multiple words. For example
if I search for "Sigourney Wever" it doesn't flag as a spelling issue as
'we
15 matches
Mail list logo
