Re: Impact/Performance of maxDistErr

2018-05-30 Thread David Smiley
I suggest using the "Intersects" spatial predicate when either the data is all points or if the query is a point. It's semantically equivalent and the algorithm is much faster. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:25 AM Jens Viebig wrote: > Thanks for the detailed answer David, that helps a lot to underst

Re: Impact/Performance of maxDistErr

2018-05-30 Thread Jens Viebig
Thanks for the detailed answer David, that helps a lot to understand! Best Regards Jens P.S. Currently the only search we are doing on the polygon is Contains(POINT(x,y)) Am 29.05.2018 um 13:30 schrieb David Smiley: Hello Jens, With solr.RptWithGeometrySpatialField, you always get an accurat

Re: Impact/Performance of maxDistErr

2018-05-29 Thread David Smiley
Hello Jens, With solr.RptWithGeometrySpatialField, you always get an accurate result thanks to the "WithGeometry" part. The "Rpt" part is a grid index, and most of the parameters pertain to that. maxDistErr controls the highest resolution grid. No shape will be indexed to higher resolutions than

Impact/Performance of maxDistErr

2018-05-25 Thread Jens Viebig
Hello, we are indexing a polygon with 4 points (non-rectangular, field-of-view of a camera) in a RptWithGeometrySpatialField alongside some more fields, to perform searches that check if a point is within this polygon We started using the default configuration found in several examples online