subsequent cores.
>
> workarround is to set mincount=0 for your facet ranges.
>
>
>
> : Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:17:05 + (UTC)
> : From: David Smith
> : Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, David Smith
> : To: Solr-user
> : Subject: Identical query returni
uent cores.
workarround is to set mincount=0 for your facet ranges.
: Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:17:05 + (UTC)
: From: David Smith
: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, David Smith
: To: Solr-user
: Subject: Identical query returning different aggregate results
:
: I have a prototype
ith
: To: Solr-user
: Subject: Identical query returning different aggregate results
:
: I have a prototype SolrCloud 4.10.2 setup with 13 collections (of 1 replica,
1 shard each) and a separate 1-node Zookeeper 3.4.6.
: The very first app test case I wrote is failing intermittently in this
en
Ah, OK. I didn't get that when I read your first e-mail...
Hmmm, this is still a puzzle then. Tail the respective Solr logs, you _should_
be seeing the sub-query go to each of them and the sub-query _should_
carry along all of the faceting information. Or this might just be a flat bug...
Best,
Er
Hi Erick,
Thanks for your reply.
My test environment only has one shard and one replica per collection. So, I
think there is no possibility of replicas getting out of sync. Here is how I
create each (month-based) collection:
http://192.168.59.103:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATE&name=2
bq: Facet counts include deleted documents until the segments merge
Whoa! Facet counts do _not_ require segment merging to be accurate.
What merging does is remove the _term_ information associated with
deleted documents, and removes their contribution to the TF/IDF
scores.
David:
Hmmm, what happ
Alex,
Good suggestion, but in this case, no. This example is from a cleanroom type
test environment where the collections have very recently been created, there
are only 4 documents total across all collections, and no delete's have been
issued.
Kind regards,
David
On Tuesday, December
Facet counts include deleted documents until the segments merge. Could that
be an issue?
Regards,
Alex
On 16/12/2014 12:18 pm, "David Smith" wrote:
> I have a prototype SolrCloud 4.10.2 setup with 13 collections (of 1
> replica, 1 shard each) and a separate 1-node Zookeeper 3.4.6.
> The ver
I have a prototype SolrCloud 4.10.2 setup with 13 collections (of 1 replica, 1
shard each) and a separate 1-node Zookeeper 3.4.6.
The very first app test case I wrote is failing intermittently in this
environment, when I only have 4 documents ingested into the cloud.
I dug in and found when I q
