oh, tee hee if if our eternal admiration and gratitude isn't
obvious... 8-)
i concur, the amount one *can* customize simply from the XML
configuration
and schema is fantastically impressive! almost all of the configuration
setup it is quick to do in our experience, too
--tracey
Walter Unde
On 1/27/07 1:12 PM, "Tracey Jaquith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * To be fair, Michael StAck (our greatest help for prior SE "life support")
> has smartly pointed out that by making a smarter schema and strategy,
> I could reduce the number of fields searched from 677 to 5, with the
> sam
Message
From: Tracey Jaquith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 5:12:44 AM
Subject: INTERNET ARCHIVE goes SOLR!
Internet Archive on Monday afternoon switched over to SOLR!
We converted from a badly deteriorating "home grown" s
On 1/29/07 7:46 PM, "Ryan McKinley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Your argument is a good one, and I buy it. However, I've never had a
>> case where a user typing "multiple words" where the expectation was
>> for OR, it is always AND.
>
> But there are many cases where the expectation is to t
On Jan 29, 2007, at 11:01 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
if there are cases where DisMax isn't the right choice for raw user
input
... i'm not aware of them, but i'd love to hear about them :)
Ok, ok, ok... I'm a self-admitted dismax avoider thus far. I'll
remedy that by building in dismax ca
On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:46 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Your argument is a good one, and I buy it. However, I've never had a
case where a user typing "multiple words" where the expectation was
for OR, it is always AND.
But there are many cases where the expectation is to to get the best
results
On 1/29/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
there is no prefix operator for "OR" so if the default is "AND" there is
no way at request time to indicate that some clauses should be optional
without reverting to the ugly and missleading binary operator syntax ...
Perhaps that's somethi
: > case where a user typing "multiple words" where the expectation was
: > for OR, it is always AND.
if the input you are passing in comes straight fram a user -- and that
user doesn't understand the Lucene query syntax -- i'd argue
that StandardRequestHandler is the wrong choice, and you should
Your argument is a good one, and I buy it. However, I've never had a
case where a user typing "multiple words" where the expectation was
for OR, it is always AND.
But there are many cases where the expectation is to to get the best
results possible. With AND you get zero results even when the
On Jan 29, 2007, at 6:15 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: > We override defaultOperator of "OR" to "AND".
:
: We really ought to make AND the default anyway.
No, no, no, no, No..
:)
Your argument is a good one, and I buy it. However, I've never had a
case where a user typing
congrats on the successfull roll-out Tracey,
: We don't use DisMax and (as of now) do not use faceting.
: And finally, the hardest part to convert to Solr.
: I had to write a PHP front-end custom converter to take our query strings,
: parse the clauses and lucene syntax into pieces, and
: > We override defaultOperator of "OR" to "AND".
:
: We really ought to make AND the default anyway.
No, no, no, no, No..
there is no prefix operator for "OR" so if the default is "AND" there is
no way at request time to indicate that some clauses should be optional
without rev
Tracey,
Thanks for sharing! This is a fantastic case study. Your
experiences and numbers will certainly be a major sales pitch for
bringing Solr into more organizations.
On Jan 27, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Tracey Jaquith wrote:
We've done essentially no optimizing outside of focusing on a
"s
:12:44 AM
Subject: INTERNET ARCHIVE goes SOLR!
Internet Archive on Monday afternoon switched over to SOLR!
We converted from a badly deteriorating "home grown" server that
was made up of java + jetty ( + rsync for replication) + an older
version of lucene.
I make some compar
Internet Archive on Monday afternoon switched over to SOLR!
We converted from a badly deteriorating "home grown" server that
was made up of java + jetty ( + rsync for replication) + an older
version of lucene.
I make some comparisons of SOLR vs. "prior" using "[]" notes below.
I parsed 2 d
15 matches
Mail list logo
