Thanks Shawn and Scott for your feedback. It is really appreciated.
> -Original Message-
> From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
> Sent: August-14-13 12:39 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Huge discrepancy between QTime and ElapsedTime
>
>
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> You also have grouping enabled. From what I understand, that can be slow.
> If you turn that off, what happens to your elapsed times?
QTime would include that. It includes everything up until the point
where the response starts streaming b
On 8/14/2013 9:09 AM, Jean-Sebastien Vachon wrote:
I am running some benchmarks to tune our Solr 4.3 cloud and noticed that while
the reported QTime is quite satisfactory (100 ms or so), the elapsed time is
quite large (around 5 seconds). The collection contains 12.8M documents and the
index
Jean-Sebastien,
We have had similar issues. In our cases, our QTime varied between 100ms
and as much as 120s (that's right, 120,000ms). The times were so long that
they resulted in timeouts upstream.
In our case, we have settled in on the following hypothesis:
The actual retrieval time (clock
Hi All,
I am running some benchmarks to tune our Solr 4.3 cloud and noticed that while
the reported QTime is quite satisfactory (100 ms or so), the elapsed time is
quite large (around 5 seconds). The collection contains 12.8M documents and the
index size on disk is about 35 GB.. I have only on
