Sorry - I meant indexed. I don't store the fields.
--dallan
> -Original Message-
> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 9:30 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to store a dense field value e
Oops, that's a Lucene bit (got confused which list
I was on).
You can still control storing the raw text in SOLR, so
my question is still relevant, but the solution may be
different. Do you store the fields?
Erick
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I'm surprised by a 30%
I'm surprised by a 30% increase. The approach of adding a
special token for "not present" is one of the standard ones
So just to check, when you say "stored", are you really
storing the missing value? As in Field.Store.YES? As
opposed to Field.Index.###? Because theres no
need to Store this va
Hi,
I want to issue queries where queried fields have a specified value or are
"missing". I know that I can query missing values using a negated
full-range query, but it doesn't seem like that's very efficient (the fields
in question have a lot of possible values). So I've opted to store special
