> >
> > I am deeply hurt by your distrust.
> >
> > :-)
>
> Shame on me :-$
haha :-)
>
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 11:52 +0200, Ard Schrijvers wrote:
> > > you're missing the key piece that Ard alluded to ... the
> > there is one
> > > ordere list of all terms stored in the index ... a TermEnum lets you
> > > iterate over this ordered list, and the
> > IndexReader.terms(Term) method
> >
> > you're missing the key piece that Ard alluded to ... the
> there is one
> > ordere list of all terms stored in the index ... a TermEnum lets you
> > iterate over this ordered list, and the
> IndexReader.terms(Term) method
> > lets you efficiently start at an arbitrary term. if you are only
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 11:41 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : > TermEnum terms = searcher.getReader().terms(new Term(field, ""));
> : > while (terms.term() != null && terms.term().field() == field){
> : > //do things
> : > terms.next();
> : > }
>
> : while( te.next() )
: > TermEnum terms = searcher.getReader().terms(new Term(field, ""));
: > while (terms.term() != null && terms.term().field() == field){
: > //do things
: > terms.next();
: > }
: while( te.next() ) {
: final Term term = te.term();
you're missing the ke
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 21:39 +0200, Ard Schrijvers wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 00:30 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> > > : Is it possible to get the values from the ValueSource (or from
> > > : getFieldCacheCounts) sorted by its natural order (from lowest to
> > > : highest values)?
> > >
> >
Hello,
>
> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 00:30 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> > : Is it possible to get the values from the ValueSource (or from
> > : getFieldCacheCounts) sorted by its natural order (from lowest to
> > : highest values)?
> >
> > well, an inverted term index is already a data structure
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 00:30 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : Is it possible to get the values from the ValueSource (or from
> : getFieldCacheCounts) sorted by its natural order (from lowest to
> : highest values)?
>
> well, an inverted term index is already a data structure listing terms
> from l
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 00:30 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : Is it possible to get the values from the ValueSource (or from
> : getFieldCacheCounts) sorted by its natural order (from lowest to
> : highest values)?
>
> well, an inverted term index is already a data structure listing terms
> from l
: Is it possible to get the values from the ValueSource (or from
: getFieldCacheCounts) sorted by its natural order (from lowest to
: highest values)?
well, an inverted term index is already a data structure listing terms
from lowest to highest and the associated documents -- so if you want to
it
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 23:32 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : This part (reading field values) takes fairly long compared
> : to the other fields (that use getFacetTermEnumCounts or
> : getFieldCacheCounts as implemented in SimpleFacets), so that
> : I asume that there is potential for optimization
: This part (reading field values) takes fairly long compared
: to the other fields (that use getFacetTermEnumCounts or
: getFieldCacheCounts as implemented in SimpleFacets), so that
: I asume that there is potential for optimization.
:
: Fairly long: getFieldCacheCounts for the cat field takes ~7
Hi,
I have a custom Facet implementation that extends SimpleFacets
and overrides getTermCounts( String field ).
For the price field I calculate available ranges, for this I
have to read the values for this field. Right this looks like
this:
public NamedList getTermCounts( final String field
13 matches
Mail list logo
