To be honest, I've never consider it as a problem, beside of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7730
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Nickolay41189 wrote:
> But what about using cache? In my old code I used it. I need the same
> functionality.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
But what about using cache? In my old code I used it. I need the same
functionality.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-get-SortedDocValues-in-lucene-5-2-1-tp4216858p4216869.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
that's how dig guys do it
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/trunk/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/request/DocValuesFacets.java#L77
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> you can call getSortedDocValues() right from reader
>
> On Sat,
you can call getSortedDocValues() right from reader
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Nickolay41189
wrote:
> In lucene-4.10.1 for to get *SortedDocValues *I used this code:
>
> SolrIndexSearcher searcher = request.getSearcher();
> AtomicReader reader = searcher.getAtomicReader();
> SortedDocValu
In lucene-4.10.1 for to get *SortedDocValues *I used this code:
SolrIndexSearcher searcher = request.getSearcher();
AtomicReader reader = searcher.getAtomicReader();
SortedDocValues sourceIndex = FieldCache.DEFAULT.getTermsIndex(reader,
fieldName);
It worked fine, but now I don't understand what
