-find-the-ordinal-for-a-numeric-doc-value-tp4224018p4224255.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ut my
> question
> is still valid I think!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-find-the-ordinal-for-a-numeric-doc-value-tp4224018p4224037.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Sincer
tedsolr wrote:
> I'm sure there is a good reason why SortedDocValues exposes
> the backing dictionary and [Sorted]NumericDocValues does not.
There is: Numerics does not have a backing dictionary. Instead of storing the
values via the intermediate ordinals-map (aka by reference), they are stored
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-find-the-ordinal-for-a-numeric-doc-value-tp4224018p4224037.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ted]NumericDocValues does not. How do
I get to the ordinal for number and date fields?
I assume my fallback is to not index with doc values, and use an uninverting
reader to get the field data. Is there a better approach?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-
