g.xml. This is why I was asking if I need to raise the number in
> the configuration.
>
> Is there any issue or will there be any performance improvement if I raise
> up the size for documentCache?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this messag
raise the number in
the configuration.
Is there any issue or will there be any performance improvement if I raise
up the size for documentCache?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-determine-cache-setting-in-Solr-Search-Instance-tp4216562p4216591
io of
> zero for queryResultCache and fieldValueCache was surprising (zero). Is it
> possible that this is due to randomly generated requests?
>
> What are some guideline in tuning the cache parameter?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-determine-cache-setting-in-Solr-Search-Instance-tp4216562.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 7/9/2015 9:48 AM, wwang525 wrote:
> I did a load test with a total of 800 requests (at 40 concurrent requests
> per second) to be executed against Solr index with 14 M records. Performance
> was good (< 1 second) especially after a short period of time of the test.
> BTW, the second round of loa
ing (zero). Is it
possible that this is due to randomly generated requests?
What are some guideline in tuning the cache parameter?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-determine-cache-setting-in-Solr-Search-Instance-tp4216562.html
Sent from the S
