Well, the only "search" i did, was ask this question on this
mailing-list :-)
On 26/05/14 17:05, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
Did not follow the whole story but " post-query-value-filter" does exist in
Solr. Have you tried searching for pretty much that expression. and maybe
something about cos
Thanks for responding, Yonik. I tried out your suggestion, and it seems
to work as it is supposed to, and it performs at least as well as the
"hacky implementation I did myself". Wish you had responded earlier. Or
maybe not, then I wouldn't have dived into it myself making an
implementation tha
Did not follow the whole story but " post-query-value-filter" does exist in
Solr. Have you tried searching for pretty much that expression. and maybe
something about cost-based filter.
Regards,
Alex
On 26/05/2014 6:49 pm, "Per Steffensen" wrote:
> Do not know if this is a special-case. I gue
Do not know if this is a special-case. I guess an AND-query where one
side hits 500-1000 and the other side hits billions is a special-case.
But this way of carrying out the query might also be an optimization in
less uneven cases.
It does not require that the "lots of hits"-part of the query is
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> Per Steffensen [st...@designware.dk] wrote:
>> * It IS more efficient to just use the index for the
>> "no_dlng_doc_ind_sto"-part of the request to get doc-ids that match that
>> part and then fetch timestamp-doc-values for those doc-ids t
Per Steffensen [st...@designware.dk] wrote:
> * It IS more efficient to just use the index for the
> "no_dlng_doc_ind_sto"-part of the request to get doc-ids that match that
> part and then fetch timestamp-doc-values for those doc-ids to filter out
> the docs that does not match the "timestamp_dlng
I can answer some of this myself now that I have dived into it to
understand what Solr/Lucene does and to see if it can be done better
* In current Solr/Lucene (or at least in 4.4) indices on both
"no_dlng_doc_ind_sto" and "timestamp_dlng_doc_ind_sto" are used and the
doc-id-sets found are inter
Hi
Lets say I have a Solr collection (running across several servers)
containing 5 billion documents. A.o. each document have a value for
field "no_dlng_doc_ind_sto" (a long) and field
"timestamp_dlng_doc_ind_sto" (also a long). Both "no_dlng_doc_ind_sto"
and "timestamp_dlng_doc_ind_sto" are
