RE: Hijacking Search Requests

2009-03-31 Thread Alex Wang
Thanks Noble Paul for the valuable tip. A servlet filter sounds like a great solution here. >-Original Message- >From: Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 1:29 AM >To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >Subject: Re: Hijacking

Re: Hijacking Search Requests

2009-03-30 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
ent: Monday, March 30, 2009 4:49 PM >>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>Subject: Re: Hijacking Search Requests >> >>I think this can be done with a load balancer such that you don't even >>need to go to Solr, right?  Or, do you mean you want different >>"

RE: Hijacking Search Requests

2009-03-30 Thread Alex Wang
Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] >Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 4:49 PM >To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >Subject: Re: Hijacking Search Requests > >I think this can be done with a load balancer such that you don't even >need to go to Solr, right? Or, do you mean you w

Re: Hijacking Search Requests

2009-03-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll
I think this can be done with a load balancer such that you don't even need to go to Solr, right? Or, do you mean you want different "results" from Solr itself? On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Alex Wang wrote: Hi everyone, We have a web application that queries a Solr server through http.

Hijacking Search Requests

2009-03-30 Thread Alex Wang
Hi everyone, We have a web application that queries a Solr server through http. What we would like to do is to customize the Solr server and hijack the search request. If the user search term matches certain rules, then redirect the user to a different page without even performing any search in