Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-02-15 Thread O. Klein
ybe it's a bug? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3746817.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-02-14 Thread O. Klein
highlighting. That would give the highlighter a lot more flexibility. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3744054.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-02-14 Thread Koji Sekiguchi
(12/02/14 22:25), O. Klein wrote: I have not been able to find any logic in the behavior of hl.q and how it analyses the query. Could you explain how it is supposed to work? Nothing special on hl.q. If you use hl.q, the value of it will be used for highlighting rather than the value of q. There

Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-02-14 Thread O. Klein
fields is the use of Stopwords. What's also weird is that a query like hl.q=content_spell:(SC) also highlights synonyms, eventhough this field has no synonyms. I have not been able to find any logic in the behavior of hl.q and how it analyses the query. Could you explain how it is suppo

Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-02-14 Thread O. Klein
if synonyms work when using hl.q? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3743317.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-02-13 Thread O. Klein
ge in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3740280.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-02-13 Thread Koji Sekiguchi
I got it fixed now I think. I thought that if you used it like "hl.q=spell Checker" it would use the query analysis of the field that was being highlighted as default. But in my case it needs to be "hl.q=content_hl:(spell Checker)" for it to work. The behavour I got default made no sense whatsoev

Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-02-13 Thread O. Klein
> -- > http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ > I got it fixed now I think. I thought that if you used it like "hl.q=spell Checker" it would use the query analysis of the field that was being highlighted as default. But in my case it needs to be "hl.q=content_hl:(spell Checker)" for it to work. The behavour I got default made no sense whatsoever. Could you be so kind to explain a bit more how hl.q is supposed to work and with some examples? Thanx. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3740114.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-02-11 Thread Koji Sekiguchi
(12/02/11 21:19), O. Klein wrote: Koji Sekiguchi wrote (12/01/24 9:31), O. Klein wrote: Let's say I search for "spellcheck solr" on a website that only contains info about Solr, so "solr" was added to the stopwords.txt. The query that will be parsed then (dismax) will not contain the term "so

Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-02-11 Thread O. Klein
problems when I am using terms with uppercase. Eventhough I use on the highlighted field in both query and index I do get search results, but just no highlights (lowercasing the terms fixes the problem). Can someone confirm whether this is a bug? Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3734892.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-01-24 Thread O. Klein
Ah, I never used the hl.q That did the trick. Thanx! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3684245.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-01-24 Thread Koji Sekiguchi
(12/01/24 9:31), O. Klein wrote: Let's say I search for "spellcheck solr" on a website that only contains info about Solr, so "solr" was added to the stopwords.txt. The query that will be parsed then (dismax) will not contain the term "solr". So fragments won't contain highlights of the term "so

Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-01-23 Thread O. Klein
uot;) and others need to be highlighted and affect scoring (e.g. "spellcheck"). What are your thoughts on this? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3683452.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Highlighting stopwords

2012-01-23 Thread Koji Sekiguchi
(12/01/23 23:14), O. Klein wrote: Im using trunk and FVH and eventhough I filter stopwords when searching, I would like to highlight stopwords in fragments. Using a different field without the stopwords filter did not have the desired effect. Please provide more info. In particular, how your qu

Highlighting stopwords

2012-01-23 Thread O. Klein
.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3681901.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.