We developed a custom Highlighter to solve this issue.
We added a "url" field in the solr schema doc for our domain and when
highlighting is called, we access the file, extract the information and send
them to the custom highlighter.
If you still need some help, I can provide you, our solution in
Also, consider what you'd be reconstructing from if you could try it. The
indexed data has been transformed by, say, stemming, casing, etc. So
any attempt to reconstruct the fields for highlighting would necessarily
show the transformed version, which would not be pleasing. Plus you could
have syno
Thanks for the insight.
This is definitely a feasible solution because I only need to highlight when
the user open the document.
I guess the easiest way I can do this is to "reuse" the solr code (with some
modification) in my own application.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Pradeep Singh wrote:
Another way you can do this is - after the search has completed, load the
field in your application, write separate code to reanalyze that
field/document, index it in RAM, and run it through highlighter classes. All
this as part of your web application outside of Solr. Considering the size
of your
Hi,
I understand that I need to store the fields in order to use highlighting
"out of the box".
I'm looking for a way to highlighting using term offsets instead of the
actual text since the text is not stored. What am asking is is it possible
to modify the response (thru custom implementation) to
Check out this link
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase
You need to store the field if you want to use the highlighting feature.
If you need to retrieve and display the highlighted snippets then the fields
definitely needs to be stored.
To use term offsets, it will be a good idea
Hi,
I've been looking thru the mailing archive for the past week and I haven't
found any useful info regarding this issue.
My requirement is to index a few terabytes worth of data to be searched.
Due to the size of the data, I would like to index without storing but I
would like to use the highli
