le digital video
>>
>> That seems shockingly long for something of size "five".
>>
>> 4. Very rarely I'll get a fragment that doesn't actually contain any
>> of the search terms. For example, maybe I'll search for "cat", and
>> I'll get back "three ounces of milk" as a snippet. I need to explore
>> this more, though the last time this happened when I opened the
>> document and found that when I located "three ounces of milk" in the
>> document text, the word "cat" did appear nearby; so maybe the document
>> did contain "three ounces of milk for the cat".
>>
>> Obviously I'm not describing my setup in much detail. Let me know what
>> you think would be helpful to know more about.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Highlighting-Oddities-tp20351015p21843092.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
t actually contain any
> of the search terms. For example, maybe I'll search for "cat", and
> I'll get back "three ounces of milk" as a snippet. I need to explore
> this more, though the last time this happened when I opened the
> document and found that when I located "three ounces of milk" in the
> document text, the word "cat" did appear nearby; so maybe the document
> did contain "three ounces of milk for the cat".
>
> Obviously I'm not describing my setup in much detail. Let me know what
> you think would be helpful to know more about.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Highlighting-Oddities-tp20351015p21841992.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I'm testing out the default (gap) fragmenter with some simple,
single-word queries on a patched 1.3.0 release populated with some
real-world data. (I think the primary quirk in my setup is that I'm
using ShingleFilterFactory to put word bigrams (aka shingles) into my
index. I was worried that this
