123123
123123
--DIR--
/dir001/a/b/c/d
/dir001/a/b/c1/d1
/dir002/a/b/c1/d1
/dir002/a/b/c1/d1
/?/?/?.
...
...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Hierarchical-Facets-filt
Hoss had a great webinar on faceting that also covered how you could
do hierarchical.
http://www.lucidimagination.com/solutions/webcasts/faceting
See "taxonomy facets", about 28 minutes in.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Andy wrote:
> I have facets that ar
I have facets that are hierarchical. For example, Location can be represented
as this hierarchy:
Country > State > City
If each document can only have a single value for each of these facets, then I
can just use separate fields for each facet.
But if multiple values are allowed, then that appr
0-final. I would
like to upgrade the 1.4.0-dev... Did someone managed to get 1.4.0-final or
higher working with SOLR-64? Any hint would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Wadim
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Strict-Hierarchical-Facets-%28SOLR-64%29-tp27612209p27612209
: This approach works (I do a similar thing using solr), but you have to be
: careful as BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses exception can be thrown depending where
: you use the wild card. It should be fine in the case you described however.
You'll never get a TooManyClauses from a prefix or range query
This approach works (I do a similar thing using solr), but you have
to be careful as BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses exception can be thrown
depending where you use the wild card. It should be fine in the case
you described however. Anyway, there is a pretty interesting
discussion about this he
On Dec 13, 2007, at 1:56 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
ie, if this is your hierarchy...
Products/
Products/Computers/
Products/Computers/Laptops
Products/Computers/Desktops
Products/Cases
Products/Cases/Laptops
Products/Cases/CellPhones
Then this trick won't work (because L
: > such that if you search for category, you get all those documents that have
: > been tagged with the category AND any sub categories. If this is possible I
: > think I'll investigate using solr in place of some existing code we have
: > that deals with indexing and searching of such data.
:
:
I handle this trough the interface
I've got dynamics fileds ( path_0, path_1 , ... ) to make it easier.
Florent
-Message d'origine-
De : Sean Laval [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 10 décembre 2007 14:54
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : does solr handle hi
On Dec 10, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Sean Laval wrote:
eg. category/subcategory/subsubcategory?
such that if you search for category, you get all those documents
that have been tagged with the category AND any sub categories. If
this is possible I think I'll investigate using solr in place of
som
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is a good way to do it or not (so comments are
more than welcome!), but the way we have achieved this is using the
idea that a category/subcategory/subsubcategory etc create a path
that we associate with a document. This is the simple field
definition we use:
so
eg. category/subcategory/subsubcategory?
such that if you search for category, you get all those documents that have
been tagged with the category AND any sub categories. If this is possible I
think I'll investigate using solr in place of some existing code we have that
deals with indexing an
On Mar 8, 2007, at 10:52 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
or something like...
Dir1
Subdir1
SubSubDir1
...but this is why Hierarchical facets are hard.
I've not yet tackled hierarchical facets myself despite the demand
being there. It seems there are various ways this could be
implem
: Dir1
: Dir1/Subdir1
: Dir1/Subdir1/SubSubDir1
or something like...
Dir1
Subdir1
SubSubDir1
...but this is why Hierarchical facets are hard.
(it just occured to me that this is a differnet hiearchical facets thread
then the one i thought it was .. you may want to check the arcives for
duplicate the info in multiple fields
like that, I'd be happier.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 10:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hierarchical Facets
Assuming I'm understanding your q
I am running into a stumbling block and can only find a way to solve the
problem with some sort of hierarchical faceting system. I am in the
process of moving my records from eXist (http://exist.sf.net) to Solr,
but the problem is with the lack of a "directory structure" that exist
has. I fig
d the number of files under each that match.
: Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:11:54 -0500
: From: Andrew Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: To: Andrew Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: Re: Hierarchical Facets
:
: Hmm ... I
Hmm ... I had a brain storm.
Could I do something like this:
Dir1/Subdir1/SubSubDir1
Then query collection:"Dir1/Subdir1" and get the facets on collection at
that point to see all of the subsubdirectories?
Is their any better method?
Andrew
Andrew Nagy wrote:
I am running into a stumbling b
E: i'm not sure if that's a limitation of the system, or an attempt at
making the UI consistent) ... ths is the area where i think hierarchical
facets are particulararly tricky, programaticly guess what the most
usefull subset of the hierarchy to display would be based on the
constraints
I don't know about that ... CNET has hundreds of thousands of products,
with tens of thousands facet constraints ... and Solr seems to be doing ok
for us :)
Touché... I'm impressed :-)
Still... I've got to write an application that will allow users to
assign a detailed subject classificat
: creating a generic facet framework. It would be interesting to know if
: any work has been published which enumerates the design patterns
: involved. I found Marti Hearst's research paper "Design Recommendations
: for Hierarchical Faceted Search" very useful...
: http://flamenco.berkeley.edu/p
Chris,
: > Are there any ideas on how to support hierarchical facets?
It may be hard to roll out a truely "generic" way of sorting hierarchical
counts that would be usefull for people.
Thanks for the examples. I see what you mean about the difficulty in
creating a
Hi Yonik,
Are there any ideas on how to support hierarchical facets?
I've thought of some optimizations and general approach (not yet
implemented) when it's a strict hierarchy.
Thanks for your comments.
Of the two approaches you mention (storing the full tag path or creating
a st
: > My main interest
: > is in Solr's fledgling support for faceted search.
: >
: > Are there any ideas on how to support hierarchical facets?
there are two different things that fall under the heading of
"hierarchical facets", and they can be very differnet...
The f
On 11/2/06, David Legg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just discovered Solr and realized its potential!
Welcome!
My main interest
is in Solr's fledgling support for faceted search.
Are there any ideas on how to support hierarchical facets?
I've thought of some opti
I've just discovered Solr and realized its potential! My main interest
is in Solr's fledgling support for faceted search.
Are there any ideas on how to support hierarchical facets?
Take a facet like 'Location' for example. This can be thought of as
hierarchical becau
26 matches
Mail list logo
