Re: Help with Solr configuration for LuSql performance comparison

2008-12-08 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
For the nested entities there is a feature called CachedSqlEntityProcessor to make things faster (if you have enough RAM) On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Chris Hostetter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> : Fi

Re: Help with Solr configuration for LuSql performance comparison

2008-12-08 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : First, LuSql default uses Lucene's StandardAnalyzer[4]. The Javadocs > : indicates it uses StandardTokenizer[5], StandardFilter[6], > : LowerCaseFilter[7], and StopFilter[8]. I have created a fieldType in > : my Solr

Re: Help with Solr configuration for LuSql performance comparison

2008-12-08 Thread Chris Hostetter
: First, LuSql default uses Lucene's StandardAnalyzer[4]. The Javadocs : indicates it uses StandardTokenizer[5], StandardFilter[6], : LowerCaseFilter[7], and StopFilter[8]. I have created a fieldType in : my Solr configuration's schema.xml that I hope is the equivalent to : this: if you want to b

Help with Solr configuration for LuSql performance comparison

2008-12-01 Thread Glen Newton
Hello, I am putting together some performance comparisons of LuSql[1] and Solr's Data Import Request Handler[2], JdbcDataSource[3]. I want to make sure I am comparing apples with apples, so would appreciate the community helping me to make sure I am doing so. First, LuSql default uses Lucene's St