filtering):
"milk", "with", "honey", "is", "god"
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Daniel Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.or
May 6, 2008 6:01:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Help optimizing
>
>
> On May 6, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> > On May 3, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Daniel Andersson wrote:
> >
> >> When performing a search, the results vary between 1.5 seconds up
> >> t
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help optimizing
Thanks Otis!
On May 4, 2008, at 4:32 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> You have a lot of fields of type text, but a number of field sound
> like they really need not be tokenized and should thus be of type
> string.
I've
On May 6, 2008, at 7:26 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
One cause of out-of-memory is multiple simultaneous requests. If you
limit
the query stream to one or two simultaneous requests, you might fix
this.
No, Solr does not have an option for this. The servlet containers have
controls for this that
On May 6, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On May 3, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Daniel Andersson wrote:
When performing a search, the results vary between 1.5 seconds up
to 60 seconds.
Is this pure Solr time or overall application time? I ask, b/c it
is often the case that people are mea
On May 6, 2008, at 4:00 AM, Mike Klaas wrote:
On 3-May-08, at 10:06 AM, Daniel Andersson wrote:
How do I optimize Solr to better use all the RAM? I'm using java6,
64bit version, and start Solr using:
java -Xmx7500M -Xms4096M -jar start.jar
But according to top it only seems to be using 7.
Thanks Otis!
On May 4, 2008, at 4:32 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
You have a lot of fields of type text, but a number of field sound
like they really need not be tokenized and should thus be of type
string.
I've changed quite a few of them over to string. Still not sure about
the differe
ene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Lance Norskog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: "Norskog, Lance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2008 1:26:28 PM
> Subject: RE: Help optimizing
>
> One cause o
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 5:19 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help optimizing
On May 3, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Daniel Andersson wrote:
> Hi (again) people
>
> We've now invested in a server wi
On May 3, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Daniel Andersson wrote:
Hi (again) people
We've now invested in a server with 8 GB of RAM after too many
OutOfMemory-errors.
Our database/index is 3.5 GB and contains 4,352,471 documents. Most
documents are less than 1 kb. When performing a search, the results
On 3-May-08, at 10:06 AM, Daniel Andersson wrote:
Our database/index is 3.5 GB and contains 4,352,471 documents. Most
documents are less than 1 kb. When performing a search, the results
vary between 1.5 seconds up to 60 seconds.
I don't have a big problem with 1.5 seconds (even though belo
s with
jConsole?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Daniel Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, May 3, 2008 7:06:10 PM
> Subject: Help optimizing
>
> Hi (again)
Hi (again) people
We've now invested in a server with 8 GB of RAM after too many
OutOfMemory-errors.
Our database/index is 3.5 GB and contains 4,352,471 documents. Most
documents are less than 1 kb. When performing a search, the results
vary between 1.5 seconds up to 60 seconds.
I don't
13 matches
Mail list logo