Otis,
Thanks for the responses; you've nailed it down mostly. Please see my
thoughts below.
> > One more question - is it worth it to try to keep the whole index in
> > memory and shard when it doesn't fit anymore? For me it seems like a
bit
> > of overhead, but I may be very wrong here.
> > What
Hi Andrey,
Responses inlined.
- Original Message
> From: Andrey Shulinskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 11:23:00 PM
> Subject: RE: Hardware config for SOLR
>
> Grant,
>
> Thanks a lot for the
Grant,
Thanks a lot for the answers. Please see my replies below.
> > 1) Should we do sharding or not?
> > If we start without sharding, how hard will it be to enable it?
> > Is it just some config changes + the index rebuild or is it more?
>
> There will be operations setup, etc. And you'll ha
> I have not worked with SSDs, though I've read all the good information that's
> trickling to us from Denmark. One thing that I've been wondering all along is
> - what about writes? That is, what about writes "wearing out" the SSD? How
> quickly does that happen and when it does happen, what ar
arl Wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 6:15:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Hardware config for SOLR
>
>
> 19 sep 2008 kl. 23.22 skrev Grant Ingersoll:
>
> > As for HDDs, people have noted some nice speedups in
> > As for HDDs, people have noted some nice speedups in Lucene using
> > Solid-state drives, if you can afford them.
>
> I've seen the average response time cut in 5-10 times when switching
> to SSD. 64GB SSD is starting at EUR 200 so that can be a lot cheaper
> to do replace the disk than
19 sep 2008 kl. 23.22 skrev Grant Ingersoll:
As for HDDs, people have noted some nice speedups in Lucene using
Solid-state drives, if you can afford them.
I've seen the average response time cut in 5-10 times when switching
to SSD. 64GB SSD is starting at EUR 200 so that can be a lot cheap
Inline below.
On Sep 17, 2008, at 6:32 PM, Andrey Shulinskiy wrote:
Hello,
First, some numbers we're expecting.
- The average size of a doc: ~100K
- The number of indexes: 1
- The query response time we're looking for: < 200 - 300ms
- The number of stored docs:
1st year: 500K - 1M
2nd
Matthew,
Thanks, a very good point.
Andrey.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Runo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:38 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Hardware config for SOLR
>
> I can't speak to a lot o
I can't speak to a lot of this - but regarding the servers I'd go with
the more powerful ones, if only for the amount of ram. Your index will
likely be larger than 1 gig, and with only two you'll have a lot of
your index not stored in ram, which will slow down your QPS.
Thanks for your time
Hello,
We're planning to use SOLR for our project, got some questions.
So I asked some Qs yesterday, got no answers whatsoever. Wondering if
they didn't make sense, or if the e-mail was too long... :-)
Anyway, I'll try to ask them again and hope for some answers this time.
It's a very n
11 matches
Mail list logo
