Re: Further questions about behavior in ReversedWildcardFilterFactory

2012-04-20 Thread neosky
I have to discard this method at this time. Thank you all the same. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Further-questions-about-behavior-in-ReversedWildcardFilterFactory-tp3905416p3926423.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Further questions about behavior in ReversedWildcardFilterFactory

2012-04-12 Thread Erick Erickson
the 5 with > ReversedWildcardFilterFactory > The tailer MNO* should be fast to match 4 > But What about *MNO* ? > Thanks! > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Further-questions-about-behavior-in-ReversedWildcardFilterFactory-tp3905416p3905416.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Further questions about behavior in ReversedWildcardFilterFactory

2012-04-12 Thread neosky
pens here. The leading *MNO should be fast to match the 5 with ReversedWildcardFilterFactory The tailer MNO* should be fast to match 4 But What about *MNO* ? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Further-questions-about-behavior-in-ReversedWildcardFilterFact