apache.org
Subject: RE: Filter Question
Hi Monica,
AFAIK there is nothing like the filter you've described, and I believe it would
be generally useful. Maybe it could be called StopTermTypesFilter? (Plural on
Types to signify that more than one type of term can be stopped by a single
n like StopFilter.
>
> Steve
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Monica Skidmore [mailto:monica.skidm...@careerbuilder.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 1:04 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Otis Gospodnetic
>> Subject: RE: Filter Question
>>
&
ilter should have an enablePositionIncrements option like StopFilter.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Monica Skidmore [mailto:monica.skidm...@careerbuilder.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 1:04 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Otis Gospodnetic
> Subject: RE: Filter
ssage-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 12:37 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Filter Question
Monica,
This is different from Solr's synonyms filter with different synonyms files,
one for index-time and the other f
>To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
>Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 11:37 AM
>Subject: Filter Question
>
>Our Solr implementation includes a third-party filter that adds additional,
>multiple term types to the token list (beyond "word", etc.). Most of the time
>this
Our Solr implementation includes a third-party filter that adds additional,
multiple term types to the token list (beyond "word", etc.). Most of the time
this is exactly what we want, but we felt we could improve our search results
by having different tokens on the index and query side. Since
I created the following SearchComponent that wraps a deduplicate filter
around the current query and added it to last-components. It appears to
be working, but is there any way I can improve the performance? Would
this be considered and added to the filtercache? Am I even caching
correctly?
T
highest score to
> those containing both
> city:(+New +Delhi) --> city contains 'new' AND city contains 'delhi'
> city:"New Delhi"~1000 --> city contain 'new' with 1000 words of
> 'delhi', highest score to matches having the words n
request/DisMaxRequestHandler.html
>
>
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Filter-question...-tf3609407.html#a10088438
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: not find it, if there were other words in between (e.g. New Capital Delhi).
then you should use field:"New Delhi"~3 or (+field:New +field:Delhi) what
you have now is going to match any docs that have "New" in any of the
fields you care about or Delhi in whatever you default search field is.
in
On 4/19/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Jennifer. But the issue with the quotes would be that it would match
the string exactly and
not find it, if there were other words in between (e.g. New Capital Delhi).
If you want to restrict a section of a query to a field, use brackets:
gt;words "New" and "Delhi".
>
> I'm just starting with this, put I found you need to do;
> primary_state:"New Delhi"
>
> I never used the OR yet!
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Filter-questi
Is there a way to only retrieve those records that contain both the
words "New" and "Delhi".
I'm just starting with this, put I found you need to do;
primary_state:"New Delhi"
I never used the OR yet!
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Filter-question...-tf3609407.html#a10085687
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
14 matches
Mail list logo
