.body=%3Ccommit/%3E ( didn't
> seem to do anything either)
>
>
> From: Ahmet Arslan
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" ; Mike L.
>
> Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 7:20 AM
> Subject: Re: FileDataSource vs JdbcDataSouce (speed) Solr 3.5
>
>
> Hi Mike
requests on
different data files containing different data?
Thanks in advance. This was very helpful.
Mike
From: Shawn Heisey
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: FileDataSource vs JdbcDataSouce (speed) Solr 3.5
On 7/1/
On 7/1/2013 12:56 PM, Mike L. wrote:
Hey Ahmet / Solr User Group,
I tried using the built in UpdateCSV and it runs A LOT faster than a
FileDataSource DIH as illustrated below. However, I am a bit confused about the
numDocs/maxDoc values when doing an import this way. Here's my Get comman
.
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: FileDataSource vs JdbcDataSouce (speed) Solr 3.5
Hi Mike,
You could try http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV
And make sure you commit at the very end.
From: Mike L.
To: "solr-user@lucene.apac
che.org"
> Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 3:15 AM
> Subject: FileDataSource vs JdbcDataSouce (speed) Solr 3.5
>
>
>
> I've been working on improving index time with a JdbcDataSource DIH based
> config and found it not to be as performant as I'd hoped for, for various
Hi Mike,
You could try http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV
And make sure you commit at the very end.
From: Mike L.
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 3:15 AM
Subject: FileDataSource vs JdbcDataSouce (speed
I've been working on improving index time with a JdbcDataSource DIH based
config and found it not to be as performant as I'd hoped for, for various
reasons, not specifically due to solr. With that said, I decided to switch
gears a bit and test out FileDataSource setup... I assumed by eliminiat
