On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:07 PM, revas wrote:
Hi,
I typically issue a facetdrill down query thus
q=somequery and Facetfield:facetval .
Is there any issues with the above approach as opposed to
&fq=facetfield:value in terms of memory consumption and the use of
cache.
Yes... using fq allows tho
Hi,
I typically issue a facetdrill down query thus
q=somequery and Facetfield:facetval .
Is there any issues with the above approach as opposed to
&fq=facetfield:value in terms of memory consumption and the use of cache.
Regards
Suajatha
