Just a followup on this, I found that the method below using URL params
doesn't work when using the Rest API, if you try to set the field in your
facet object to something like "{!ex=dt}doctype" it throws an error. Here's
the documentation on the correct method to use with the API.
http://yonik.co
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> We can always use more documentation. One of the
> valuable things about people getting started is that it's an
> opportunity to clarify documents. Sometimes the people who
> develop/write the docs jump into the middle and assume
> the reade
>> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jamal, Sarfaraz <
>> > sarfaraz.ja...@verizonwireless.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thank you Andrew, that looks like exactly what I am looking for =)
>> >> Thank you Robert, it looks like we are both doing
re both doing it in similar fashion
> =)
> >> Thank you MaryJo for jumping right in!
> >>
> >> Sas
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Andrew Chillrud [mailto:achill...@opentext.com]
> >> Sent: Thu
>> From: Andrew Chillrud [mailto:achill...@opentext.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 2:17 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [E] Re: Faceting Question(s)
>>
>> It is possible to get the original facet counts for the field you are
>>
--Original Message-
> From: Andrew Chillrud [mailto:achill...@opentext.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 2:17 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [E] Re: Faceting Question(s)
>
> It is possible to get the original facet counts for the field you are
> filtering
, 2016 2:17 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [E] Re: Faceting Question(s)
It is possible to get the original facet counts for the field you are filtering
on (we have been using this since Solr 3.6). Don't know if this can be extended
to get the original counts for all fields ho
amp;facet.field=team&fq=team:rollback
>>>
>>> The counts are obviously different now, as the result set is limited to
>>> one team.
>>>
>>> Sas
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: MaryJo Sminkey [mailto:mjsmin...@g
separating them with commas.
- Andy -
-Original Message-
From: Robert Brown [mailto:r...@intelcompute.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:12 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [E] Re: Faceting Question(s)
MaryJo, I think you've mis-understood. The counts are different
.snippets=20&facet=true&facet.field=team&fq=team:rollback
The counts are obviously different now, as the result set is limited to
one team.
Sas
-Original Message-
From: MaryJo Sminkey [mailto:mjsmin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 1:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.
iously different now, as the result set is limited to
> one team.
>
> Sas
>
> -Original Message-
> From: MaryJo Sminkey [mailto:mjsmin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 1:56 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [E] Re: Faceting Question(s)
&g
s=20&facet=true&facet.field=team&fq=team:rollback
The counts are obviously different now, as the result set is limited to one
team.
Sas
-Original Message-
From: MaryJo Sminkey [mailto:mjsmin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 1:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
In other words... to diagnose such a problem it would really help to see
the exact parameters and filters you are using on each of the searches.
Mary Jo
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Jamal, Sarfaraz <
sarfaraz.ja...@verizonwireless.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I am working on impl
Jamai - what is your q= set to? And do you have a fq for the original
query? I have found that if you do a wildcard search (*.*) you have to be
careful about other parameters you set as that can often result in the
numbers returned being off. In my case, my defaults had things like edismax
settings
Hello Everyone,
I am working on implementing some basic faceting into my project.
I have it working the way I want to, but I feel like there is probably a better
way the way I went about it.
* I want to show a category and its count.
* when someone clicks a category, it sets a FQ= to that categ
15 matches
Mail list logo
