Re: Faceted Browsing questions

On Jun 29, 2006, at 12:30 AM, Vish D. wrote: Any update on your progress? Eager to get my hands on on your latest code... :=) It's all in our Subversion repository: Sorry I didn't announce it, but we do have a patacriticism- developm

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

Erik, Any update on your progress? Eager to get my hands on on your latest code... :=) Thanks! On 6/28/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > well, the most obvious solution i can think of would be a patch adding an : > invert() method to DocSet, HashDocSet and BitDocSet. :) :

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

: > well, the most obvious solution i can think of would be a patch adding an : > invert() method to DocSet, HashDocSet and BitDocSet. :) : : Yes, we could add a flip(startIndex, endIndex) or flip(maxDoc) Yeah ... like i suggested before just make maxDoc an intrinsic property that DocSets know w

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

On 6/26/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : My next challenge is to re-implement the catch-all facets that I used : to do by unioning all documents in an (Open)BitSet and inverting it. : How can I invert a DocSet (I realize I gat get the bits and do it : that way, but is there a bett

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

: It may not even be necessary to cache this type of lookup since it is : simply a TermEnum through specific fields in the index. Maybe simply : doing the TermEnum in the request handler instead of iterating : through a cache would be just as fast or faster. Any thoughts on that? While commutin

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

On Jun 24, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On 6/24/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This weekend :) I have imported more data than my hacked implementation can handle without bumping up Jetty's JVM heap size, so I'm now at the point where it is necessary for me to start using

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

Erik, Oh good! Keep me (us) updated!! As for committing some code into Solr, and the real world uses, I am sure we can find some generic/abstract rules for faceted browsing -- simplest being, a set of fields/categories defined in schema.xml, which could be used for an optional extented query res

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

On 6/24/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This weekend :) I have imported more data than my hacked implementation can handle without bumping up Jetty's JVM heap size, so I'm now at the point where it is necessary for me to start using the LRUCache. Though I have already refactored to

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

On Jun 24, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Vish D. wrote: Erik, when do you plan on having your implementation refactored with "good" use of code? This weekend :) I have imported more data than my hacked implementation can handle without bumping up Jetty's JVM heap size, so I'm now at the point whe

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

Thank you Chris and Erik. That makes it a bit clearer, but I might need to sit down and look at the code (nines + DisMax...) a bit closer to see how it all works in Solr. Erik, when do you plan on having your implementation refactored with "good" use of code? Or, in general, when is Solr planning

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

: nature of the data I am working with. I have searched through the mailing : list and seen some posts mentioning BitSets DocSets, etc.., but wasn't clear : on if those are already built into the solr's nightly builds (I don't see : any documentation either on the wiki, or online). Can some please

Re: Faceted Browsing questions

I'm extremely time constrained at the moment, but I'll reply briefly. Solr provides the ground work for making faceted features possible, but out of the box it does not provide it without coding a custom request handler and knowing a little about Lucene and Solr's APIs. As you've seen, bi

Faceted Browsing questions

Hi all, I am trying to figure out how I can have some type of faceted browsing working. I am also in need of a way to get a list of unique field values within a query's results set (for filtering, etc...). When I say trying, I mean having it up and running without much coding, b/c of time reasons