___
> Von: Erick Erickson [erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. September 2013 19:14
> Bis: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Facet values for spacial field
>
> You might be able to facet by query, but faceting by
> location fields d
: Erick Erickson [erickerick...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. September 2013 19:14
Bis: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Facet values for spacial field
You might be able to facet by query, but faceting by
location fields doesn't make a huge amount of sense,
you'll have lots of
Note that Solr facets on the *indexed* value, not the stored one. If you
want to facet on the points themselves, store them in your index
alongside as a 'string' field, and facet on that. But as Erick says,
that might give you rather a lot of facets, unless things tend to be
grouped by location.
U
You might be able to facet by query, but faceting by
location fields doesn't make a huge amount of sense,
you'll have lots of facets on individual lat/lon points.
What is the use-case you are trying to support here?
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Christian Köhler - ZFMK
wrote:
>
Hi,
I use the new SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType field to store geo
coordinates (e.g. 14.021666,51.5433353 ). I can retrieve the coordinates
just find so I am sure they are indexed correctly.
However when I try to create facets from this field, solr returns
something which looks like a hash
