Luis (or anyone else),
Did you ever find a solution for this problem? If not, is querying twice
the way to go? I'm looking to do the same with no luck yet.
Thanks,
Toby
***
Toby Lazar
Capital Technology Group
Email: tla...@capitaltg.com
Mobile: 646-469-5865
Hi Erick,
Thanks for the reply and sorry, my fault, wasn't clear enough. I was
wondering if there was a way to remove terms that would always be zero
(because the term came from a document that didn't match the filter query).
Here's an example. I have a bunch of documents with fields 'manufacture
That's what faceting does. The facets are only tabulated
for documents that satisfy they query, including all of
the filter queries and anh other criteria.
Otherwise, facet counts would be the same no matter
what the query was.
Or I'm completely misunderstanding your question...
Best,
Erick
On
Hi All,
Is it possible to perform a facet field query on a subset of documents (the
subset being defined via a filter query for instance)?
I understand that facet pivoting might work, but it would require that the
subset be defined by some field hierarchy, e.g. manufacturer -> price (then
only lo
