Re: Facet Field Value truncation

2010-09-14 Thread Niall O'Connor
I opened a bug for this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2120 On 09/14/2010 03:51 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Niall O'Connor wrote: Has anyone come across a situation where they have seen their facet field values wrap into a new facet entry whe

Re: Facet Field Value truncation

2010-09-14 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Niall O'Connor wrote: > Has anyone come across a situation where they have seen their facet field > values wrap into a new facet entry when the value exceeds 256 characters? Yes, for indexed string fields, there currently is a limit of 256 chars per token. It's b

Re: Facet Field Value truncation

2010-09-14 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
Faceting on a multi-value field? I wonder if your positionIncrementGap for your field definition in your schema is 256. I am not sure what it defaults to. But it seems possible if it's 256 it could lead to what you observed. Try explicitly defining it to be really really big maybe? I'm not

Facet Field Value truncation

2010-09-14 Thread Niall O'Connor
Hi, Has anyone come across a situation where they have seen their facet field values wrap into a new facet entry when the value exceeds 256 characters? For example: 2302 1403 1382 419 236 236* As you can see the last value in the tissue-antology list is split between two facet values.