gt; second. Then examine each non-text "string" field value of that document to
> see if the query terms would match after text field analysis but are not
> exact string matches for the string fields in which the terms do occur.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
> -Original Message
donado
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 9:23 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: ExtendedDisMax Question - Strange behaviour
Erick, thanks for your reply and sorry for the confusion in last e-mail.
But it is hard to explain the situation without that bunch of code.
...
Erick, thanks for your reply and sorry for the confusion in last e-mail.
But it is hard to explain the situation without that bunch of code.
In my schema I have a field called textoboost that contains copies of a lot
of other fields. Doing the query in this field I got this:
+(((textoboost:aparta
Sorry, but your post is really hard to read with all the data inline.
Try running with &debugQuery=on and looking at the parsed query, I suspect
your field lists aren't the same even though you think they are.
Perhaps a typo somewhere?
Best
Erick
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:26 PM, André Maldonado
I'm doing a query with edismax.
When I don't tell solr which fields I want to do the search (so it does in
default field), it returns 2752 documents.
ex:
http://000.000.0.0:/solr/select/?q=apartamento+moema+praia+churrasqueira&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&defType=dismax&mm=75%25