Outstanding, thanks.
- j
On 9/13/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/13/06, Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up on the merchant_name. I would probably just
keep a
> dictionary in memory, but if I wanted to pull the stored merchant_name
back,
> how
On 9/13/06, Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the heads up on the merchant_name. I would probably just keep a
dictionary in memory, but if I wanted to pull the stored merchant_name back,
how would/can I do that?
If you don't want merchant_name tokenized at all, just change t
Thanks Chris.
I bumped the facet.limit to 10 and it works like a charm.
Thanks for the heads up on the merchant_name. I would probably just keep a
dictionary in memory, but if I wanted to pull the stored merchant_name back,
how would/can I do that?
thanks,
j
On 9/13/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAI
: I just pulled down the nightly solr build from 9/12 and have it up and
: running. I copied an index created in a solr version that's about 3 months
: old.
it looks like my changes to have a sensible default (which is when
facet.limit=-1 became legal) didn't make it into solr-2006-09-12.zip, bu
I just pulled down the nightly solr build from 9/12 and have it up and
running. I copied an index created in a solr version that's about 3 months
old.
I have a query formulated like this:
http://solrbox:8080/solr/select?q=description:dell&rows=0&facet=true&facet.limit=-1&facet.field=merchant_nam
