Hi Erik (& Shawn),
On Mar 31, 2014, at 1:48pm, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 2:36 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>> Not currently possible. Solr’s SchemaCodecFactory only has a hook for
>> postings format (and doc values format).
OK, thanks for confirming.
> Would it be a reasonable thing to d
On 3/31/2014 2:36 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Not currently possible. Solr’s SchemaCodecFactory only has a hook for postings
format (and doc values format).
Erik
Would it be a reasonable thing to develop a config structure (probably
in schema.xml) that starts with something like and
h
On Mar 31, 2014, at 4:02 PM, Ken Krugler wrote:
> Hi all (and particularly Uwe and Robert),
>
> On Mar 28, 2014, at 7:24am, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>
>> You told the fieldType to use SimpleText only for the postings, not
>> all other parts of the codec (doc values, live docs, stored fiel
Hi all (and particularly Uwe and Robert),
On Mar 28, 2014, at 7:24am, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> You told the fieldType to use SimpleText only for the postings, not
> all other parts of the codec (doc values, live docs, stored fields,
> etc...), and so it used the default codec for those compo
You told the fieldType to use SimpleText only for the postings, not
all other parts of the codec (doc values, live docs, stored fields,
etc...), and so it used the default codec for those components.
If instead you used the SimpleTextCodec (not sure how to specify this
in Solr's schema.xml) then a
Hi all,
I've been using the SimpleTextCodec in the past, but I just noticed something
odd…
I'm running Solr 4.3, and enable the SimpleText posting format via something
like:
The resulting index does have the expected _0_SimpleText_0.pst text output, but
I just noticed that the other fil
