verything in XML-RPC.
>>
>> Bit of a pet issue of mine! I'll be creating a JIRA issue on the subject
>> soon.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Sundling, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: 28 August 200
oon.
>
> Jon
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sundling, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 28 August 2007 03:24
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Embedded about 50% faster for indexing
> >
> > At this point I think I
nal Message-
> From: Sundling, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 August 2007 03:24
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Embedded about 50% faster for indexing
>
> At this point I think I'm going recommend against embedded,
> regardless of any perf
27, 2007 5:50 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Embedded about 50% faster for indexing
On 27-Aug-07, at 12:44 PM, Sundling, Paul wrote:
> Whether embedded solr should give me a performance boost or not, it
> did.
> :) I'm not surprised, since it skips XML parsing. Alt
On Behalf Of
Yonik Seeley
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:07 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Embedded about 50% faster for indexing
One thing I'd like to avoid is everyone trying to embed just for
performance gains. If there is really that much difference, then we
need
xes often. So
generally this is moot, but it's still interesting. :)
Paul Sundling
-Original Message-
From: Sundling, Paul
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 12:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Embedded about 50% faster for indexing
Whether embedded solr should give me a
only from
using loopback.
Paul Sundling
-Original Message-
From: climbingrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 12:22 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Embedded about 50% faster for indexing
Haven't tried the embedded server but I think I hav
r-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 12:21:56 AM
Subject: Re: Embedded about 50% faster for indexing
Haven't tried the embedded server but I think I have to agree with Mike.
We're currently sending 2000 job batches to SOLR server and the amount of
time required to tr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> >> Of Yonik Seeley
> >> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:07 PM
> >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Embedded about 50% faster for indexing
> >>
> >> One thing I'd like to avoid is everyone tr
On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Wu, Daniel wrote:
Theoretically and practically, embedded solution will be faster than
going through http/xml. I would like to see solr has some sort of
document source adapter architecture which will iterate through all
the
documents available in the document sou
On 24-Aug-07, at 2:29 PM, Wu, Daniel wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Yonik Seeley
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:07 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Embedded about 50% faster for indexing
One thing I'd li
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:07 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Embedded about 50% faster for indexing
On 8/24/07, Sundling, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Created two indexer i
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Yonik Seeley
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:07 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Embedded about 50% faster for indexing
>
> One thing I'd like t
On 8/24/07, Sundling, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Created two indexer implementations to test HTTP Post versus Embedded
> and the performance was 54.6% faster on embedded.
>
> Thought others might find that interesting that are using Java.
Paul, were the documents posted one-per-message, or
Sorry i'm new to the topic, can you point me to the Embedded approach?
thanks,
-Hui
On 8/24/07, Sundling, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Created two indexer implementations to test HTTP Post versus Embedded
> and the performance was 54.6% faster on embedded.
>
> Thought others might find t
Created two indexer implementations to test HTTP Post versus Embedded
and the performance was 54.6% faster on embedded.
Thought others might find that interesting that are using Java.
Paul Sundling
16 matches
Mail list logo
