: Yes we are using Solr for a non-traditional search purpose and the
: performance is critical. However it sounds like that sharing the same index
: could slow down reading / writing to the index. And access synchronization
: is tricky as well.
no matter how you use Solr (HTTP or Embedded) only o
ave fashion just like
> normal web based Solr?
>
> Thanks,
>
> born2fish
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Embedded-Solr-Clustering-tp24891931p24900854.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:57 AM, born2fish wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We have a web app that uses embedded solr for better performance.
I would advise against it. We use Solr on sites with millions of page views
a month on HTTP. With HTTP keep-alives, the overhead of an http request is
minimal
ure embedded solr
> instances to replicate indexes in a master / slave fashion just like normal
> web based Solr?
>
> Thanks,
>
> born2fish
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Embedded-Solr-Clustering-tp24891931p24891931.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
configure embedded solr
instances to replicate indexes in a master / slave fashion just like normal
web based Solr?
Thanks,
born2fish
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Embedded-Solr-Clustering-tp24891931p24891931.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
