thers to refer.
Regards,
Giri
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Email-Search-Slow-tp4044064p4044093.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
age in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Email-Search-Slow-tp4044064p4044087.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e a better approach?
> Regards,
> Giri
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Email-Search-Slow-tp4044064p4044078.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
On 3/1/2013 11:49 AM, girish.gopal wrote:
My Specs are:
Windows Server 2008 64 bit Dual Quad Core CPUs with 64 GB of RAM.
I have allocated 55GB of memory to Tomcat in its config.
In addition to the advice you've gotten about wildcards, your memory
allocation needs some tweaking. It is highly
.
Regards,
Giri
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Email-Search-Slow-tp4044064p4044072.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
be "giri","gmail","com". And I should do a
phrase search on this.
Would this be a better approach?
Regards,
Giri
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Email-Search-Slow-tp4044064p4044078.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ch is issued.
> Is this normal?
>
> My Specs are:
> Windows Server 2008 64 bit Dual Quad Core CPUs with 64 GB of RAM.
> I have allocated 55GB of memory to Tomcat in its config.
>
> I will check on the Heap.
> Regards,
> Giri
>
>
>
> --
> View this m
,
Giri
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Email-Search-Slow-tp4044064p4044072.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
, 2013 1:24 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Email Search Slow
Hello,
I have over 40 million records/documents and I need to retrieve them using
wildcard searches on email and / or firstname and / or lastname.
The firstname, lastname and blank search (*:*) all return results within 3
seconds
like to know what is the general recommendations for this field. I
have tried tokenizing(StandardTokenizer) and also the simple TextField for
this.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Email-Search-Slow-tp4044064.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
10 matches
Mail list logo