00:912)
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Dynamic-fields-with-more-than-100-fields-inside-tp27502271p27554402.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Since Lucene is schema-less, my assumption would be that using dynamic
fields wouldn
formance
issues from having that many fields
the only exception: I have noticed performance issues if you try to query
large numbers of fields (ie q=(foo_1:123 AND foo_2:234 ... AND foo_400:912)
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Dynamic-fields-with-more-than-100-fields-insi
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Hey,
I'm thinking about using
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler <
>> xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> I'm thinking about using dynamic fields.
>>>
>>> I n
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Hey,
I'm thinking about using dynamic fields.
I need one or more user specific field in my schema, for example,
"concept_user_*", and I will have maybe more than 200 use
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm thinking about using dynamic fields.
>
> I need one or more user specific field in my schema, for example,
> "concept_user_*", and I will have maybe more than 200 users using this
> feature.
> O
Hey,
I'm thinking about using dynamic fields.
I need one or more user specific field in my schema,
for example, "concept_user_*", and I will have maybe more than 200 users
using this feature.
One user will send and retrieve values from its field. It will then be
used to filter result.
How w
