7340032.0
> 216 8388608.0
> 217 1.048576E7
> 218 1.2582912E7
> 219 1.4680064E7
> 220 1.6777216E7
> 221 2.097152E7
> 222 2.5165824E7
> 223 2.9360128E7
> 224 3.3554432E7
> 225 4.194304E7
> 226 5.0331648E7
> 227 5.872
On 3/28/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike,
I am not doing anything custom for this test. I am assuming that the
Default Similarity is used.
Surprisingly, if I remove the document level boost (set to 1.0) and just
have a field level boost, the result
seems to be correct.
Another d
he field.
>
> -Mike
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Document-boost-not-as-expected...-tf3476653.html#a9722264
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 3/28/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Again, I fail to understand where it is doing a multiplication by 1.25
(score (2.5) = field_boost (2.0) * 1.25 ??).
As I said above, lengthNorm is also multiplied in. This will depend
on your custom similar what value(s) you have in the field.
changed.
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Document-boost-not-as-expected...-tf3476653.html#a9718403
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ditto everything Mike said, but i'm also curious what Similarity changes
you made ... without knowing what that code looks like, all bets are off
in terms of anyone being able to help you understand the scores you are
seeing.
: I am not quite sure how the score changed from 1.33 to 1.25. I am not
On 3/27/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am implementing a document boost at indexing time for the documents. I read
some posting that
seemed to indicate that omitNorm=false is needed to retain the document
boosting for retrieval.
After I did that, it looks like I am not able to get bac
o 1.25. I am not quite
sure how this might have happened - I have modified the custom similarity
but I don't quite have an explanation of how the score changed.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Document-boost-not-as-expected...-tf3476653.html#a9704479
Sent from the So
