Re: DocValued SortableText Field is slower than Non DocValued String Field for Facet

I'm not sure about _performance_, but I'm pretty sure you don't want to be faceting on docValued SortableTextField (and faceting on non-docValued SortableTextField, though I think technically possible, works against uninverted _indexed_values, so ends up doing something entirely different): https:/

DocValued SortableText Field is slower than Non DocValued String Field for Facet

I am wondering that the performance of facet of DocValued SortableText Field is slower than non Docvalued String Field. Does anyone know why? Thanks, Jae