Hi Erick,
Thanks. We do have NRT requirement in our application that updates be
immediately visible. We do have constant updates. The push is for even
faster visibility but we are holding off at 2 secs soft-commit for now.
What I am not able to understand is that as per query debugging, the facet
Oh dear. Your autowarming is almost, but not quite totally, useless given
your 2 second soft commit interval. See:
https://lucidworks.com/post/understanding-transaction-logs-softcommit-and-commit-in-sorlcloud/
So autowarming is probably not a cure, when you originally said “commit” I was
assumin
Thanks, Erick,
The process time execution based on debugQuery between the query and facets
is as follows
query 10ms
facets 4900ms
since max time is spent on facet processing (docValues enabled), query and
filter cache do no apply to this, correct?
- Autowarm count is at 32 for both and aut
Correcting some typos ...
Thanks, Eric.
1) We are using dynamic string field for faceting where indexing =false and
stored=false . By default docValues are enabled for primitive fields (solr
6.6.), so not explicitly defined in schema. Do you think its wrong
assumption? Also I do not see this fiel
OK, sounds like docValues is set.
Sure, in solrconfig.xml, there are two sections “firstSearcher” and
“newSearcher”.
These are queries (or lists of queries) that are fired as part of autowarming
when Solr is first started (firstSearcher) or when a commit happens that opens
a new searcher (newSear
Thanks, Eric.
1) We are using dynamic string field for faceting where indexing =false and
stored=false . By default docValues are enabled for primitive fields (solr
6.6.), so not explicitly defined in schema. Do you think its wrong
assumption? Also I do not this field listed in feild cache, but do
Response spikes after commits are almost always something to do
with autowarming or docValues being set to false. So here’s what
I’d look at, in order.
1> are the fields used defined with docValues=true? They should be.
With this much variance it sounds like you don’t have that value set.
You’ll h
A facet heavy query which uses docValue fields for faceting returns about
5k results executes between 10ms to 5 secs and the 5 secs time seems to
coincide with after a hard commit.
Does that have any relation? Why the fluctuation in execution time?
Thanks,
Revas
