;> hunch is that "test.pdf" gets to WDF as two separate tokens, which is
> the
> >> query that is generated on 3.6.
> >>
> >> To debug, remove the filters starting with WDF and see if the "." was
> >> still there before WDF has invoked. No ne
. It could be
that the catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1" settings are confusing the
query parser.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Katsuyoshi NOGUCHI
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 9:39 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dismax query result
h WDF and see if the "." was
>> still there before WDF has invoked. No need to reindex, just reload Solr
>> and look at the parsed query for test.pdf .
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> -Original Message- From: Katsuyoshi NOGUCHI
>> Sent: Wednesda
the "." was
> still there before WDF has invoked. No need to reindex, just reload Solr
> and look at the parsed query for test.pdf .
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Katsuyoshi NOGUCHI
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 6:03 AM
> To: solr-user
he parsed query for test.pdf .
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Katsuyoshi NOGUCHI
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 6:03 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Dismax query results vary on Solr1.4 and 3.6.
Hi, guys! I need some advice.
When sending the same dismax query to Solr 1.
Hi, guys! I need some advice.
When sending the same dismax query to Solr 1.4 and 3.6,
query results of search words analized by WordDelimiterFilterFactory are
different as below:
[Search Word]
test.pdf
[Result]
Solr1.4: Search results are analized by "test" AND "pdf"
Solr3.6: Search results are
