l Martin wrote:
> >
> > From: S G mailto:sg.online.em...@gmail.com>>
> > Subject: Discuss: virtual nodes in Solr
> > Date: June 28, 2019 at 8:04:44 PM EDT
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org<mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
> > Reply-To:
of saying it is that the burden of proof for the benefits is on you
;).
Best,
Erick
> On Jun 28, 2019, at 8:51 PM, Will Martin wrote:
>
> From: S G mailto:sg.online.em...@gmail.com>>
> Subject: Discuss: virtual nodes in Solr
> Date: June 28, 2019 at 8:04:44 P
From: S G mailto:sg.online.em...@gmail.com>>
Subject: Discuss: virtual nodes in Solr
Date: June 28, 2019 at 8:04:44 PM EDT
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org<mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org<mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
Hi,
Has
Hi,
Has Solr tried to use vnodes concept like Cassandra:
https://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/virtual-nodes-in-cassandra-1-2
If this can be implemented carefully, we need not live with just
shard-splitting alone that can only double the number of shards.
With vnodes, shards can be increased incremen
