RE: DisMax and WordDelimiterFilterFactory (limitations of MultiPhraseQuery)

2011-10-27 Thread Demian Katz
tion that might be worth overcoming -- I'm sure my use case is not the only one where this could matter. Has anyone given this any thought? - Demian > -Original Message- > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 8:21 AM &g

Re: DisMax and WordDelimiterFilterFactory

2011-10-27 Thread Erick Erickson
What happens if you change your WDDF definition in the query part of your analysis chain to NOT split on case change? Then your index should contain the right fragments (and combined words) and your queries would match. I admit I haven't thought this through entirely, but this would work for your

DisMax and WordDelimiterFilterFactory

2011-10-25 Thread Demian Katz
I've seen a couple of threads related to this subject (for example, http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg33400.html), but I haven't found an answer that addresses the aspect of the problem that concerns me... I have a field type set up like this:

Re: dismax and WordDelimiterFilterFactory with PreserveOriginal = 1

2010-03-11 Thread Erick Erickson
t;0" splitOnCaseChange="0"/> > > protected="protwords.txt"/> > > > > > > I get results back when I tried to use solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory > instead of solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory. However, the conce

RE: dismax and WordDelimiterFilterFactory with PreserveOriginal = 1

2010-03-11 Thread Ya-Wen Hsu
s anyone have a better idea on what to try next? Thanks! Wen -Original Message- From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 10:51 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: dismax and WordDelimiterFilterFactory with Preserv

Re: dismax and WordDelimiterFilterFactory with PreserveOriginal = 1

2010-03-11 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Ya-Wen Hsu wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm facing the same issue as previous post here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg19511.html. Since > no one answers this post, I thought I'll ask again. In my case, I use below > setting for index > g

dismax and WordDelimiterFilterFactory with PreserveOriginal = 1

2010-03-11 Thread Ya-Wen Hsu
Hi all, I'm facing the same issue as previous post here: http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg19511.html. Since no one answers this post, I thought I'll ask again. In my case, I use below setting for index and for query. When I use query with word "ain't", no result is

dismax and WordDelimiterFilterFactory+PreserveOriginal

2009-03-16 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi all :) I have two filters combined with dismax on the query side: WordDelimiterFilterFactory { preserveOriginal=1, generateNumberParts=1, catenateWords=0, generateWordParts=1, catenateAll=0, catenateNumbers=0} followed by lowecase filter factory. the analyzer shows the phrase gUYS and d