The simplest test to see if there are duplicates is to
check the maxDoc and numDocs in the admin UI. If
they're different then you have duplicates. NOTE:
this is not definitive, and you MUST NOT run optimize
before you look. But it's quick. I'd delete all docs
before trying this first though.
Seco
hi guys,
thank you very much for the help. sorry been so lated to reply.
1. "commit" didn't help.
after commit, the 'numFound' of "*:*" query is still the same.
2. "id" field in every doc is generated by solr using UUID, i have
idea how to check if there is a duplicated one. but i ass
Both of us implied it, but to be completely clear - if you have a duplicate
ID in your data set, SOLR will throw away previous documents with that ID
and index the new one. That's fine if your duplicates really are
duplicates - it's not OK if there's a problem in the data set and the
duplicates ID
Sweet - that's a good point - I ran into that too - I had not run the
commit for the last "batch" (I was using SolrJ) and so numbers didn't match
until I did.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Binoy Dalal wrote:
> 1) Are you sure you don't have duplicates?
> 2) All of your records might have been
The first question is whether you have duplicate ID's in your data set.
I had the same kind of thing a few months back, freaked out, and spent a
few hours trying to figure it out by coding extra logging etc... to keep
track of every single count at every stage of the process.. All the
numbers mat
1) Are you sure you don't have duplicates?
2) All of your records might have been indexed but a new searcher may not
have opened on the updated index yet. Try issuing a commit and see if that
works.
On Tue, 5 Apr 2016, 08:56 cqlangyi, wrote:
> hi there,
>
>
> i have an solr 5.2.1, when i do dat
hi there,
i have an solr 5.2.1, when i do data import, after the job is done, it's shown
165,191 rows processed successfully.
but when i query with *:*, the "numFound" shown only 163,349 docs in index.
when i tred to do it again, , it's shown 165,191 rows processed successfully.
but the *:
to
achieve that?
Thanks,
Sriram
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Mysql-data-import-issue-tp4253998p4254210.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 29 January 2016 at 04:13, vsriram30 wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using Solr 4.6.1 and I am trying to import my data from mysql to solr.
>
> In mysql, I have a table with columns,
> id, legacyid, otherfields...
>
[...]
> But still I get mysql id field to solr id field mapping. Please let me know
> how
olr id field mapping. Please let me know
how to prevent this from happening.
Thanks,
Sriram
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Mysql-data-import-issue-tp4253998.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Do you have a full stack trace? A bit hard to help without that.
On 24 Dec 2015 2:54 pm, "Midas A" wrote:
> Hi ,
>
>
> Please provide the steps to resolve the issue.
>
>
> com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLNonTransientConnectionException:
> Communications link failure during rollback(). Transa
Hi ,
Please provide the steps to resolve the issue.
com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLNonTransientConnectionException:
Communications link failure during rollback(). Transaction resolution
unknown.
12 matches
Mail list logo