: Thanks for the reply Asif. We have already tried removing the optimization
: step. Unfortunately the commit command alone is also causing an identical
: behaviour . Is there any thing else that we are missing ?
the hardlinking behavior of snapshots is based on the files in the index
directory,
Yes, of course they are stored on disk. The hard links are created from
>> > the
>> > actual files inside the index directory. When those older files are
>> > deleted
>> > by Solr, they are still left on the disk if at least one hard link to
>> that
t; by Solr, they are still left on the disk if at least one hard link to
> that
> > file exists. If you are looking for how to clean old snapshots, you could
> > use the snapcleaner script.
> >
> > Is that what you wanted to do?
> >
> > --
> > Rega
ekhar Mangar.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Create-incremental-snapshot-tp23109877p24405434.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Koushik Mitra wrote:
> Ok
>
> If these are hard links, then where does the index data get stored? Those
> must be getting stored somewhere in the file system.
>
Yes, of course they are stored on disk. The hard links are created from the
actual files inside the
Ok
If these are hard links, then where does the index data get stored? Those must
be getting stored somewhere in the file system.
Regards,
Koushik
On 18/04/09 12:35 PM, "Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्" wrote:
yeah ,that is right but those are hardlinks
http://linux.about.com/cs/linux101/g/h
yeah ,that is right but those are hardlinks
http://linux.about.com/cs/linux101/g/hardlinks.htm
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Koushik Mitra
wrote:
> When we run the snapshooter script, it creates a snapshot folder e.g.
> snapshot.20090418064010 and this snapshot folder contains physical ind
When we run the snapshooter script, it creates a snapshot folder e.g.
snapshot.20090418064010 and this snapshot folder contains physical index files
which take space on the file system (as shown below). Are we missing anything
here?
-rw-r- 46 test test 59 Apr 17 23:26 _i.tii
-rw-r
the snapshooter does not really copy any files. They ar just hardlinks
(does not consume disk space) so even a full copy is not very
expensive
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Koushik Mitra
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We want to create snapshot incrementally.
>
> What we want is every time the snap shooter
Hi,
We want to create snapshot incrementally.
What we want is every time the snap shooter script runs, it should not create a
snapshot with pre-existing (last snapshot indexes) + delta (newly created
indexes), rather just create a snapshot with the delta (newly created indexes).
Any references
10 matches
Mail list logo
